which means logic dictates, withhold belief until you get enough
mmmoh!. " "No.
I wont disturb u. I took my bat large end forward and pressed it against her cunt with my fingers I spred her lips wide. "Can I help you?" she asked, confused. My hands, on the small of your back don't stay there long.
My cock swelled in my pants and she moaned as grrowing felt my swollen member press against her through our clothing. Was that it.
You wanna fight me now?
On the contrary. I am directly on the issue. The op is a thinly disguised attempt to paint those who do not believe in abortion as "heretic" to the Christian ethos because (insert muddy religious thinking here).
How can anyone possibly think that this buffoon knows what he is doing. his ill-guided tariffs are already impacting American businesses, he's on his way to another session of insulting our allies, and he is not prepared or preparing for a critical tete-a-tete with the wily Kim Jong Il and his coterie of scheming old men. Clearly there is something wrong with our system when are stuck with this bastard and we can't hold a vote of no confidence and oust him.
The Pope is okay with anal as long as it's part of foreplay? LOL
I don't know..that doesn't look altogether real.
f...k...you have to be the dumbest marine on disqus..just go look at the general accounting office and see the cost to go to and from fl..3 million bucks...you know how much preperation it takes and how many people are involved...then times it by how many days he goes to his properties..over 100 times...and he has been in only 500 days..
2A was settled within American Law as soon as we decided to create and fund standing armed forces. Every use of it past that point in time is disingenuous, at best and more likely intentionally misleading.
I think a half-witted teacher could handle the situation with tact and aplomb with little consequence.
Stefy woke AF.
I think we agree in most things and the things we don't aren't much of an issue. But maybe the disagreement is what we mean when we say "literal". I think it's going to the argument of what do we mean when we say scripture is inspired, maybe? I can believe (and do believe) that the Bible is wholly inspired by God. That does not necessarily mean that I find it infallible though. I do not, for example, believe that an actual dragon with seven (#?) horns is going to fight with Christ at the end of the world. I do not believe that God placed His hand over Moses as He passed by, because I don't believe God has hands. That's what I mean by a literal interpretation. But that does not mean that I don't believe the Bible is true in all it says.
No it does not. It shows the results and then states there were problems with the studies listed. Do you know what inconclusive means? It ain?t evidence.
my obsession telling 99% of christians that? i can't think of a single time i've done that any other time from today. not to say it hasn't happened, but safe to say hyperbole doesn't suit you. i am glad to see you've taken note of me though. funny, 8000+ comments and i've never noticed you. for the sake of non-literalism... you've been a delight.
Interesting article that I can't get at right now.. Hopefully the thread isn't lost.
Probably because he doesn't have your Email address. Great job taking apart his arguments with so few words.
LOL, Says the man who refused to answer everyone of my posts from science. Three times in a row.
1. Absolutely False--what was proven is what we refer to as time/space began nanoseconds after the BB, which has NOTHING to do with what existed BEFORE the BB.
Actually there?s no evidence to support we are born gay or straight. I believe we are born asexual and develop a natural attraction to the opposite, or same, sex later on
AS. As religion teaches children that they are worthless sinners in need of salvation and grace to be rewarded and brutally tormented forever if not submissive and obedient to the tyranny of presumptive some god(s) I do not understand what that love you are talking about is.