A straw man is an argument, I am asking a question of those who consistently display this behavior. See the "Note" at the beginning. If it's not you, why defend yourself?
"Get my balls" I said. "I have a surprise," I winked at her as I got up and retrieved my dildo.
I knew now what I was doing was wrong but I was already getting every input in my body violated. This wasn't sswinging my thing but I would give her what she wanted after all I was now her Daddy. The first hit was delicious her screem made my cock jump.
After that, they all just got up and went back to the party, leaving me naked and filled with hot cum. I started wrapping my pink, soft, warm lips around his cock, just past the head.
I could see problems with that scenario for both of them, should he catch Bob and me. I could feel myself about to ejaculate.
Would you apply this to... say.... nuns?
Over and over we see fundamentalist forced birthers claim abortion is murder. Seems like you answered your own question. Again, get your god to knock it off, then we'll talk.
The history of the CIA is well known.
This nutcase has been given air time on Aussie TV to illustrate just how unhinged, demented and lost the far left PC ideology has become in Australia (and everywhere in the west, for that matter). She's more or less being used as an example of mental illness and mass derangement syndrome, kind of like that Crazy Kathy chick (the progressive sherpa) that keeps getting put on your Fox News network.
I certainly hope that this changes for the better. We need the right amount of balance.
No, punctuated equilibrium does not appear to fit the Genesis account.
You can very well construct a system of concepts and accompanying words that doesn't contain repetition/circularity by disallowing synonyms and by refusal to define some words any further (rooting concepts in experience/intuition). Doesn't mean such synonyms do not exist - they do and it's easy to point out. So how about you trying to define potential and actuality that are free from such circularity? Good luck.
Or maybe hell and its Hiltonized version don't exist.
I think any judge worth his salt would follow his own rules
Because you don't want to pay for another kid in the foster care system, you're going to criminalize having an abortion to spite the women who use it so you don't have to pay for another unwanted baby?
IMO, it is a huge resurgence of the Southern Strategy animated by backlash against Obama not acting exactly like a white guy with a great tan.